MYTHs of Homeopathy - A Series. Ep. 4

“Homeopathy is just a placebo effect”

It is frequently argued that homeopathic medicines are ‘just sugar pills’ that don’t contain any active ingredients, so any benefits patients report are due purely to the placebo effect i.e. people believe the pills are going to help and this belief alone triggers a healing response.

With any medical treatment there is likely to be some degree of ‘placebo effect’ and in this respect homeopathy is no different, but the theory that homeopathy’s effects are only a placebo response is not supported by the scientific evidence.

If homeopathy is really just a placebo effect, how does one explain:

  1. The existence of positive high quality placebo-controlled trials? These trials are designed specifically to separate out the placebo effect from the real clinical effect of the treatment being tested.
  2. Homeopathic medicines having effects in laboratory experiments? Effects have been seen on white blood cells, frogs and wheat plants to name just a few examples.
  3. The fact that homeopathy works in animals? A rigorous research study found that homeopathy can prevent E. coli diarrhoea in piglets1 – a big problem in commercial farmingMore

References

Find out more about similar statements:

A top research organisation in Australia just found homeopathy doesn’t work for anything and is just placebo

The UK Parliamentary report has looked at the evidence and said it’s just placebo

Myths about Homeopathy - A Series. Ep. 3

“Scientists say homeopathy is impossible”

Not all scientists believe homeopathy is impossible. Prof Luc Montagnier, who won a Nobel prize in 2008 for his role in discovering HIV, says homeopaths are right to use these high dilutions.

In an interview for Science magazine, when asked, “Do you think there’s something to homeopathy…?” he replied, “…What I can say now is that the high dilutions are right. High dilutions of something are not nothing. They are water structures which mimic the original molecules.”1

More

Science is a constantly evolving field and what the scientific establishment declares to be ‘impossible’ in one era, is often proved to be ‘fact’ in another.

To take just one famous example of medical U-turns, in 1982, when Dr Barry Marshall and Dr Robin Warren first put forward their theory that bacterial infection was an underlying cause of stomach ulclers, their idea was ridiculed.2  

Scientists said it was impossible for bacteria to survive the acidic environment in the stomach, let alone thrive there, but years later Marshall and Warren were vindicated when it was finally accepted that they were right – Helicobacter pylori infection is indeed the commonest cause of stomach ulcers.

In 2005 they were awarded the Nobel prize for Physiology. In the Nobel citation the doctors were praised for their “tenacity, and willingness to challenge prevailing dogmas”.

While scientists continue to investigate how homeopathic medicines have a biological effect, perhaps we should be more cautious about using the word ‘impossible’ when it comes to medical science.

References

Priorities and methods for developing the evidence profile of homeopathy

Priorities and methods for developing the evidence profile of homeopathy Recommendations of the ECH General Assembly and XVIII Symposium of GIRI

M. Van Wassenhovencorrespondence
Vice president of the GIRI, Research Coordinator of ECH.

 

Abstract

To achieve scientific acceptance, homeopathy must investigate several questions:

  • 1.

    The activity of very highly diluted preparations. The consensus of the meeting was that there is clear evidence of this.

  • 2.

    The content of very highly diluted homeopathic preparations. More research is needed but evidence exists that a specific signal is present in homeopathic preparations.

  • 3.

    A theoretical framework in which the effects of homeopathic diluted preparations can be explained. The ‘Body Information Theory’ is such a theory.

  • 4.

    The clinical effectiveness of homeopathy. Because they avoid the placebo effect, animal studies are a priority.

For human trials using Quality of Life questionnaires, studies on the activity, content and theoretical basis of homeopathic preparations were reviewed approximately 70% of cases; more in children showed improvement. Homeopathy reduced costs and allowed a better improvement in work-days lost compared with conventional practice. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) implicitly test the placebo hypothesis; RCTs have been performed and meta-analyses conclude that there is clear evidence of efficacy which cannot be attributed to placebo effect.

Priorities depend on the audience. More research is needed especially regarding the content of homeopathic preparations and the transmission of information. Theoretical issues are also important to avoid incorrect design of research protocols. More effort should be dedicated to veterinary research. Clinical effects analysis in humans remains important. Many other questions should be prioritised, such as the potential of homeopathy to avoid invasive procedures in children and the long-term effects of homeopathy in preventing chronic complications.

http://www.homeopathyjournal.net/article/S1475-4916%2805%2900025-1/fulltext

Homeopathy: meta-analyses of pooled clinical data.

Forsch Komplementmed. 2013;20(5):376-81. doi: 10.1159/000355916. Epub 2013 Oct 17.

Homeopathy: meta-analyses of pooled clinical data.

Abstract

In the first decade of the evidence-based era, which began in the mid-1990s, meta-analyses were used to scrutinize homeopathy for evidence of beneficial effects in medical conditions. In this review, meta-analyses including pooled data from placebo-controlled clinical trials of homeopathy and the aftermath in the form of debate articles were analyzed. In 1997 Klaus Linde and co-workers identified 89 clinical trials that showed an overall odds ratio of 2.45 in favor of homeopathy over placebo. There was a trend toward smaller benefit from studies of the highest quality, but the 10 trials with the highest Jadad score still showed homeopathy had a statistically significant effect. These results challenged academics to perform alternative analyses that, to demonstrate the lack of effect, relied on extensive exclusion of studies, often to the degree that conclusions were based on only 5-10% of the material, or on virtual data. The ultimate argument against homeopathy is the 'funnel plot' published by Aijing Shang's research group in 2005. However, the funnel plot is flawed when applied to a mixture of diseases, because studies with expected strong treatments effects are, for ethical reasons, powered lower than studies with expected weak or unclear treatment effects. To conclude that homeopathy lacks clinical effect, more than 90% of the available clinical trials had to be disregarded. Alternatively, flawed statistical methods had to be applied. Future meta-analyses should focus on the use of homeopathy in specific diseases or groups of diseases instead of pooling data from all clinical trials.

© 2013 S. Karger GmbH, Freiburg.

PMID:
24200828
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

n late 2011, the Swiss government's report on homeopathic medicine represents the most comprehensive evaluation of homeopathic medicine ever written by a government

The Swiss government has a long and widely-respected history of neutrality, and therefore, reports from this government on controversial subjects need to be taken more seriously than other reports from countries that are more strongly influenced by present economic and political constituencies. When one considers that two of the top five largest drug companies in the world have their headquarters in Switzerland, one might assume that this country would have a heavy interest in and bias toward conventional medicine, but such assumptions would be wrong.  In late 2011, the Swiss government's report on homeopathic medicine represents the most comprehensive evaluation of homeopathic medicine ever written by a government and was just published in book form in English (Bornhoft and Matthiessen, 2011). This breakthrough report affirmed that homeopathic treatment is both effective and cost-effective and that homeopathic treatment should be reimbursed by Switzerland's national health insurance program. 

The Swiss government's inquiry into homeopathy and complementary and alternative (CAM) treatments resulted from the high demand and widespread use of alternatives to conventional medicine in Switzerland, not only from consumers but from physicians as well. Approximately half of the Swiss population have used CAM treatments and value them. Further, about half of Swiss physicians consider CAM treatments to be effective. Perhaps most significantly, 85 percent of the Swiss population wants CAM therapies to be a part of their country's health insurance program. 

It is therefore not surprising that more than 50 percent of the Swiss population surveyed prefer a hospital that provides CAM treatments rather to one that is limited to conventional medical care. 

Beginning in 1998, the government of Switzerland decided to broaden its national health insurance to include certain complementary and alternative medicines, including homeopathic medicine, traditional Chinese medicine, herbal medicine, anthroposophic medicine, and neural therapy. This reimbursement was provisional while the Swiss government commissioned an extensive study on these treatments to determine if they were effective and cost-effective. The provisional reimbursement for these alternative treatments ended in 2005, but as a result of this new study, the Swiss government's health insurance program once again began to reimburse for homeopathy and select alternative treatments. In fact, as a result of a national referendum in which more than two-thirds of voters supported the inclusion of homeopathic and select alternative medicines in Switzerland's national health care insurance program, the field of complementary and alternative medicine has become a part of this government's constitution (Dacey, 2009; Rist, Schwabl, 2009). 

The Swiss Government's "Health Technology Assessment" 

The Swiss government's "Health Technology Assessment" on homeopathic medicine is much more comprehensive than any previous governmental report written on this subject to date. Not only did this report carefully and comprehensively review the body of evidence from randomized double-blind and placebo controlled clinical trials testing homeopathic medicines, they also evaluated the "real world effectiveness" as well as safety and cost-effectiveness. The report also conducted a highly-comprehensive review of the wide body of preclinical research (fundamental physio-chemical research, botanical studies, animal studies, and in vitro studies with human cells). 

And still further, this report evaluated systematic reviews and meta-analyses, outcome studies, and epidemiological research. This wide review carefully evaluated the studies conducted, both in terms of quality of design and execution (called "internal validity") and how appropriate each was for the way that homeopathy is commonly practiced (called "external validity"). The subject of external validity is of special importance because some scientists and physicians conduct research on homeopathy with little or no understanding of this type of medicine (some studies tested a homeopathic medicine that is rarely used for the condition tested, while others utilized medicines not commonly indicated for specific patients). When such studies inevitably showed that the homeopathic medicine did not "work," the real and accurate assessment must be that the studies were set up to disprove homeopathy... or simply, the study was an exploratory trial that sought to evaluate the results of a new treatment (exploratory trials of this nature are not meant to prove or disprove the system of homeopathy but only to evaluate that specific treatment for a person with a specific condition). 

After assessing pre-clinical basic research and the high quality clinical studies, the Swiss report affirmed that homeopathic high-potencies seem to induce regulatory effects (e.g., balancing or normalizing effects) and specific changes in cells or living organisms. The report also reported that 20 of the 22 systematic reviews of clinical research testing homeopathic medicines detected at least a trend in favor of homeopathy.* (Bornhöft, Wolf, von Ammon, et al, 2006) 

The Swiss report found a particularly strong body of evidence to support the homeopathic treatment of Upper Respiratory Tract Infections and Respiratory Allergies. The report cited 29 studies in "Upper Respiratory Tract Infections/AllergicReactions," of which 24 studies found a positive result in favor of homeopathy. Further, six out of seven controlled studies that compared homeopathic treatment with conventional medical treatment showed that homeopathy to be more effective than conventional medical interventions (the one other trial found homeopathic treatment to be equivalent to conventional medical treatment). All of these results from homeopathic treatment came without the side effects common to conventional drug treatment. In evaluating only the randomized placebo controlled trials, 12 out of 16 studies showed a positive result in favor of homeopathy. 

The authors of the Swiss government's report acknowledge that a part of the overall review of research included one review of clinical research in homeopathy (Shang, et al, 2005). However, the authors noted that this review of research has been widely and harshly criticized by both advocates and non-advocates of homeopathy. The Swiss report noted that the Shang team did not even adhere to the QUORUM guidelines which are widely recognized standards for scientific reporting (Linde, Jonas, 2005). The Shang team initially evaluated 110 homeopathic clinical trials and then sought to compare them with a matching 110 conventional medical trials. Shang and his team determined that there were 22 "high quality" homeopathic studies but only nine "high quality" conventional medical studies. Rather than compare these high quality trials (which would have shown a positive result for homeopathy), the Shang team created criteria to ignore a majority of high quality homeopathic studies, thereby trumping up support for their original hypothesis and bias that homeopathic medicines may not be effective (Lüdtke, Rutten, 2008). 

The Swiss report also notes that David Sackett, M.D., the Canadian physician who is widely considered to be one of the leading pioneers in "evidence based medicine," has expressed serious concern about those researchers and physicians who consider randomized and double-blind trials as the only means to determine whether a treatment is effective or not. To make this assertion, one would have to acknowledge that virtually all surgical procedures were "unscientific" or "unproven" because so few have undergone randomized double-blind trials. 

In my view, for a treatment to be determined to be "effective" or "scientifically proven," a much more comprehensive assessment of what works and doesn't is required. Ultimately, the Swiss government's report on homeopathy represents an evaluation of homeopathy that included an assessment of randomized double blind trials as well as other bodies of evidence, all of which together lead the report to determine that homeopathic medicines are indeed effective. 

The next article will discuss further evidence provided in this report from the Swiss government on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of homeopathic care. 

--- REFERENCES: 

Bornhoft, Gudrun, and Matthiessen, Peter F. Homeopathy in Healthcare: Effectiveness, Appropriateness, Safety, Costs. Goslar, Germany: Springer, 2011. http://rd.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-642-20638-2/page/1(This book is presently available from the German office of the publisher, and it will become available via the American office as well as select booksellers in mid- to late-February, 2012.)(NOTE: When specific facts in the above article are provided but not referenced, this means that these facts were derived from this book.) 

Bornhöft G, Wolf U, von Ammon K, Righetti M, Maxion-Bergemann S, Baumgartner S, Thurneysen AE, Matthiessen PF. Effectiveness, safety and cost-effectiveness of homeopathy in general practice - summarized health technology assessment. Forschende Komplementärmedizin (2006);13 Suppl 2:19-29. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16883077 

Dacey, Jessica. Therapy supporters roll up sleeves after vote. SwissInfo.ch, May 19, 2009. http://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/politics/Therapy_supporters_roll_up_sleeves_after_vote.html?cid=670064 

Linde K, Jonas W. Are the clinical effects of homeopathy placebo effects? Lancet 36:2081-2082. DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67878-6. http://download.thelancet.com/pdfs/journals/lancet/PIIS0140673605678786.pdf 

Lüdtke R, Rutten ALB. The conclusions on the effectiveness of homeopathy highly depend on the set of analysed trials. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. October 2008. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.06/015. http://www.jclinepi.com/article/S0895-4356(08)00190-X/abstract 

Rist L, Schwabl H: Komplementärmedizin im politischen Prozess. Schweizer Bevölkerungstimmt über Verfassungsartikel «Zukunft mit Komplementärmedizin» ab. Forsch Komplementmed 2009, doi 10.1159/000203073. (Translation: Complementary medicine in the political process: The Swiss population votes on the Constitutional Article "The future with complementary medicine" http://www.ayurveda-association.eu/files/swiss_referendum_on_cam_-_forschkomplementmed_2009.pdf 

*Although this Swiss government report was just published in book form in 2011, the report was finalized in 2006. In light of this date, the authors evaluated systematic reviews and meta-analyses on homeopathic research up until June 2003. 

By, Dana Ullman, MPH, is America's leading spokesperson for homeopathy and is the founder of www.homeopathic.com. He is the author of 10 books, including his bestseller, Everybody's Guide to Homeopathic Medicines. His most recent book is, The Homeopathic Revolution: Why Famous People and Cultural Heroes Choose Homeopathy (the Foreword to this book was written by Dr. Peter Fisher, the Physician to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II). Dana lives, practices, and writes from Berkeley, California. 

--

Your Wellness Team at

~Access Natural Healing Centre~

604-568-4663

el@accessnaturalhealing.com

www.accessnaturalhealing.com

Facebook:

http://www.facebook.com/homeopath#!/AccessNaturalHealing

Twitter:

http://twitter.com/#!/accesshealing

LinkedIn:

http://www.linkedin.com/profile/edit?trk=hb_tab_pro_top

 

“The information contained in this message is for educational purposes and constitutes a response to a private request for information only and does not constitute a solicitation for services and makes no claim or promise that any product or service that may cure any condition or ailment,”

[Fwd: [HOMEOPATHY] Who is more neutral than the Swiss...]

Who is more neutral than the Swiss...
Dana Ullman 6:40am Feb 15
Who is more neutral than the Swiss government...and this is the most positive report on homeopathy ever published by a government! This is great news...spread the good news! http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dana-ullman/homeopathic-medicine-_b_1258607.html?ref=health-and-fitness&ir=Health+and+Fitness
The Swiss Government's Remarkable Report on Homeopathic Medicine

www.huffingtonpost.com
The Swiss government's report on homeopathic medicine represents the most comprehensive evaluation o...

View Post on Facebook · Edit Email Settings · Reply to this email to add a comment.
--

Your Wellness Team at

~Access Natural Healing Centre~

604-568-4663

el@accessnaturalhealing.com

www.accessnaturalhealing.com

Facebook:

http://www.facebook.com/homeopath#!/AccessNaturalHealing

Twitter:

http://twitter.com/#!/accesshealing

LinkedIn:

http://www.linkedin.com/profile/edit?trk=hb_tab_pro_top

 

“The information contained in this message is for educational purposes and constitutes a response to a private request for information only and does not constitute a solicitation for services and makes no claim or promise that any product or service that may cure any condition or ailment,”

How Safe Is Universal Hepatitis B Vaccination? by Burton A. Waisbren, Sr., M.D., F.A.C.P.

 How Safe Is Universal Hepatitis B Vaccination? by Burton A. Waisbren, Sr., M.D., F.A.C.P.

http://www.waisbrenclinic.com

INTRODUCTION Universal hepatitis B vaccination of infants in the United States, regardless of risk factors, was first proposed by Margolis and his coworkers of the hepatitis branch of the Center for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta, Georgia.(1,2) The concept was endorsed and augmented by West and his coworkers at the Merck Sharpe and Dohme research laboratories in West Point, Pennsylvania.(3) The rationale presented for universal vaccination of infants in the U.S. stemmed from the failure of the current strategies for controlling this disease and not from trials that demonstrated the effectiveness or safety of a universal hepatitis B vaccination program.(4,5) In spite of this, universal hepatitis B vaccination is achieving wide spread acceptance among medical organizations and is being vigorously pursued in many sections of the country.(5,6)

To be presented here are four patterns that raise some concerns about vaccinating all babies in the U.S. with the hepatitis B vaccine. The patterns are as follows: The historical pattern of events that followed the introduction of an antirabies vaccine in the late 1800's and of warnings regarding probable occurrence of vaccine complications given by medical scientists during the past 50 years; the pattern revealed by animal experimentation that showed that viruses and viral particles may cause demyelination and autoimmunity in a variety of species; the pattern of autoimmunity and demyelination that has been caused by the hepatitis B infection, itself; the pattern of clinical reports that reveal that demyelination and autoimmunity have appeared in patients vaccinated with hepatitis B vaccines.

Reasonable steps that might be taken to address the concerns evoked by the above patterns will be discussed.

--------------------------------------------------------

Postvaccinal Encephalomyelitis and Warnings by Medical Scientists

Postvaccinal encephalomyelitis has been recognized and accepted as a clinical entity since it first occurred after Pasteur's antirabies vaccine was used. (7) At first the encephalomyelitis was thought to be caused by the nervous tissue in which the virus used for the vaccine was grown. (7) However, postvaccinal encephalomyelitis has appeared in patients who received vaccine grown in duck eggs, so it is now thought that the syndrome is caused by something present in the dead virus.(8) Postvaccinal encephalomyelitis has since been observed after a wide variety of vaccinations.

Within the past 30 years representatives of the medical establishment have discussed and warned about neurologic complications of various vaccines. (9-12) Wilson, in his 1967 monograph regarding vaccine complications, pointed out that there are no insurance policies without premiums and that strict attention must be paid to the premiums exacted by each vaccine.(9) Miller, in 1954, discussed the neurologic sequelae of vaccination and the difficulty of these complications being recognized and accepted. (10) Zuckerman, in an article in 1974 in Nature entitled "Hepatitis Vaccine: A note of caution" pointed out that autoimmunity might well follow the hepatitis B vaccinations because the disease, itself, involved autoimmunity.(11) He suggested, "careful assessment of all vaccine effects on the immune system."(11) As late as 1988, Hilleman, who some call the "father" of hepatitis B vaccine, warned "the message from the hypothetical hepatitis B example is that the administration of antigens or monoclonal antibodies that directly or indirectly raise antibodies that attach to host cell receptors may carry large liabilities even though they might provide a convenient means for preventing viral access to host cells... antibodies attached to cell receptors may invite the same kinds of adverse response that are believed to be responsible for a variety of autoimmune disorders." (12)

Experiments In Animals That Lead To Concerns about the Hepatitis B Vaccine

Experiments done on animals in the past 60 years have yielded data that add to the concerns about present day viral vaccines. These experiments have shown that polypeptide chains of the types found in viruses that are homologous or nearly homologous with myelin can cause demyelination and have shown that viruses, themselves, can cause demyelination.(13)

The experiments started in 1956 when Rivers showed that myelin injected into monkeys caused demyelination.(14) Wakesman expanded these studies and developed an experimental model in which myelin and adjuvant consistently caused demyelinating disease in mice and rabbits.(15) This has been widely accepted as a model for demyelinating diseases in humans and is called experimental allergic encephalomyelitis (EAE). (16) Stohlman found that a DNA virus called JHM could cause demyelination in mice. (17) Oldstone then presented experimental evidence that autoimmunity in humans was caused by polypeptides in viruses that were homologous to those in human tissue. (18) Fujinami and Oldstone produced EAE in rabbits with proteins from hepatitis B virus that had polypeptides in it that were homologous with myelin.(19) Ziegler produced EAE in rabbits with the Swine Flu Vaccine and adjuvants.(20)

Westall and Root-Bernstein presented data that suggested a syndrome they called Multiple-Antigen-Mediated-Autoimmunity (MAMA) could occur in animals and humans. (21) They postulated that the MAMA Syndrome was operative in postvaccinal encephalomyelitis as well as in EAE.(21) Root-Bernstein hypothesized that this syndrome could occur in humans if four conditions were met. The first was demonstrated homology between an antigen and host tissue. The second was the presence simultaneously, of more than one antigen. The third was complementarity between the antigens shown to be present. The fourth was the additional presence of a bacterial adjuvant. As will be discussed later, all of these requirements can be tested for as a possible explanation for post hepatitis B vaccine reactions.

Finally, the HLA patterns of experimental animals has been shown to influence their susceptibility to experimental demyelinating diseases.(22)

Hepatitis B Infection Causes Autoimmunity and Demyelination

Another group of patterns regarding the consideration of universal hepatitis vaccination, without factoring in risk factors that have been largely ignored, are those revealed by the findings that the infection, itself, causes autoimmunity and demyelination. In 1977, London first reported that autoimmune disease was caused by circulating immune complexes caused by viral antibody association.(23) In 1987, Tsukada reported demyelinizing neuropathy associated with the hepatitis B infection.(24) Discussions and case reports regarding autoimmunity occurring with the hepatitis B infection have been presented by Vento et al and McFarlane et al.(25,26) As early as 1976, Zuckerman cautioned that since autoimmunity is involved in the pathogenesis of hepatitis B infections that it might be augmented by a hepatitis B vaccination.(11)

Reports Of Demyelination and Autoimmunity After Hepatitis B Vaccination

Clinical experiences since the general release of hepatitis B vaccines suggest that clinical counterparts of the animal studies and autoimmunity that occurs after the hepatitis B infection occur after hepatitis B vaccination. The first report of demyelination after the hepatitis B vaccination was that of Ribera and Dutka in 1983. The complication was transient.(27) The authors stated inflammatory polyradiculoneuropathies after both viral diseases and vaccinations have been widely reported.(27) They emphasized the necessity of continued surveillance of the use of hepatitis B vaccine.(27) I have noted seven cases of a neurologic picture resembling multiple sclerosis (MS) after hepatitis B vaccination. (28) In 1987, Fried et al reported uveitis that occurred in a 20-year-old nurse after a booster dose of hepatitis B vaccine.(29) They pointed out that there is a higher than normal level of hepatitis B antibodies in some uveitis patients. They postulated that these antibodies combined with surface antigens in the vaccine could form a disease producing immune complex.(29)

Shaw et al reported a post marketing surveillance study regarding neurologic events after the hepatitis B vaccine in 1988. (30) An estimated 850,000 individuals had received the vaccine by the time of their study. They found ten cases of Bell's palsy, nine cases of Guillain-Barre Syndrome, five cases of lumbar radiculopathy, three cases of brachial plexus neuropathy, five cases of optic neuritis, and four cases of transverse myelitis. They concluded, on the basis of the controversial epidemiologic methods used to study the Swine Flu epidemic of 1976, that the risk of the vaccine was outweighed by the prophylactic benefits in "high risk groups."(30,31) However, even using these methods, they concluded that the demyelinating disease, Guillain-Barre Syndrome, occurred more often in individuals who had been vaccinated than in the general population.(30) In 1988, Biron et al reported a case of myasthenia gravis that occurred after anesthesia and a hepatitis B vaccination.(32) They postulated that the autoimmune disease was due to the "challenge" to the immune system by the vaccine.(32) In 1989, Goolsby reported a case of erythema nodosum that occurred after recombinant hepatitis B vaccine. (33) In 1991, Herroelen et al reported on two patients who developed symptoms of increasing demyelination after a vaccination of recombinant hepatitis B vaccine. (34) He mentioned that their HLA patterns might be a contributing factor. Seven hundred reports of adverse reactions to the hepatitis B vaccine were sent in to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting Systems (VAERS) between October 1990 and September 1991.(35) This system was set up via the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986. Sixteen percent of these reports were of damage presumed to be to the myelin of the nervous system. There were 21 cases of facial paralysis and six cases of MS. Eighty-two of the complications occurred in patients who received plasma derived vaccine and 18 occurred in those who received recombinant vaccine. (35) This difference can be explained by the fact that at the time the VAERS were examined, the recombinant vaccine had just come into general use. In 1990, in the World Health Organization Drug Information Bulletin two cases of optic neuritis and one case of Guillain-Barre Syndrome were reported to be among the 200 reports of adverse reactions that were reported by the Australian National Regulatory Body. (36) One patient had vertigo and diplopia attributed to demyelination eight months after the vaccination.(36)

In 1993, Trevisani et al reported a case of transverse myelitis that followed a recombinant vaccination in an 11 year-old girl.(37) Their arguments for a causal link between the vaccination and the transverse myelitis were the temporal association (21 days), the previous report of Shaw's in which the same complication occurred, and no clinical evidence of any other cause of the disease.(37) They pointed out that transverse myelitis was occasionally found in patients with hepatitis B. (37) This suggested to them that there might be antigenic determinants held in common with the capsular antigen of the hepatitis B vaccine and myelin.(37)

In 1993, Nadler et al reported a case of "classic MS," the prodromal of which appeared 10 days after a recombinant vaccination. (38) They stated that the benefits of the hepatitis B vaccination, among the population for "which it is usually recommended," far out weigh any potential risks.(38) In 1990, there was a report in the British Medical Journal of vasculitis related to the hepatitis B vaccination.(39) It was felt to be due to immune complex disease. In 1993, Brezin et al reported visual loss and eosinophilia after a recombinant hepatitis B vaccine.(40)

In 1995, Kaplanski et al reported a case of central nervous system demyelination that occurred in a 37-year-old man two weeks after receiving the third hepatitis B injection.(41) This patient had the same haplotype as the patient reported by Herroelen.(34) They suggested that the hepatitis B vaccination could potentially induce CNS demyelination in patients with HLA, B7, DR2 haplotype, whether or not these patients have a history of MS.(41)

Vautier and Carty in 1994 reported a case of classic rheumatoid arthritis that followed a hepatitis B vaccination.(42) They brought up the fact that the patient was HLA, DR4 positive which would be consistent with both animal and previous clinical reports regarding complications of the hepatitis B vaccine.(22,33,42) Hassan and Oldham reported two cases of reactive arthritis and Reiter's Syndrome that occurred after a recombinant hepatitis B vaccine.(43) They cite a personal communication from the manufacturer that stated that in 11 cases reported to them of reactive arthritis following recombinant hepatitis B vaccine that six had a recurrence of symptoms after a second vaccination.(43)

In 1995, Tartaglina et al reported a case of postvaccinal myelitis that occurred one month after a hepatitis B vaccination.. (44) They suggested that complications of this sort may be under reported because there can be a delay in symptom occurrences.(44) In the case they reported, symptoms did not occur until one month after a single injection of the vaccine. No other cause of the myelitis was shown by a MRI.(44)

DISCUSSION

How might the concerns evoked by the material that has been presented be addressed?

Parents of babies and adolescents who have little chance of being exposed to hepatitis B should be made aware of the potential dangers of the vaccine. A perspective, inclusive, long term follow up study of a large number of individuals who have received the vaccine should be done and the results should be made available to the parents of children who are to be vaccinated. While these admittedly tedious studies are being conducted, databases available through societies such as the Multiple Sclerosis Society might be used to determine if an inordinate number of patients with multiple sclerosis had received a hepatitis B vaccination prior to being diagnosed.

The literally hundreds of individuals who have been reported to VAERS and pharmaceutical companies, who claim to have suffered demyelination and autoimmunity from a hepatitis B vaccine, should be followed up to determine their HLA patterns to ascertain if host factors are partially causative of the complication.(22,33)

A large group of individuals who are to be vaccinated should have before and after determinations by the methods of Zhang, Wucherpfennig and Strominger of the percentage of their T-cells that exhibit antimyelin activity to determine if vaccination does evoke such cells in some individuals with certain HLA patterns.(47,48)

The ability of vaccines when injected with adjuvant into animals to cause EAE should be tested using the methods of Fujinami and Ziegler.(19,20)

The hypothesis and studies of Westall and Root-Bernstein that indicate a multifactorial pathogenesis of postvaccinal encephalomyelitis suggest a series of studies that could be done on vaccines and on patients who developed complications after the hepatitis B vaccination.(21) Hepatitis B vaccine and all other vaccines should be tested for the extent of their polypeptide homology with human tissue.(13,21) If significant homology were to be demonstrated, the offending polypeptides could be removed from the vaccine or synthetic vaccines could be produced without them. (49,50) If such a homology were to be demonstrated, it would fulfill the first requirement for the provocative hypothetical MAMA Syndrome of Westall and Root-Bernstein. (21) The second requirement for the MAMA Syndrome is that multiple antigens are present.(21) These could be tested for by serologic studies for the Epstein-Barr Virus and other viruses that already have been indicted in this syndrome.(21) The third requirement that complementarity between antigens must be demonstrated could be tested for by complementarity studies between the hepatitis B vaccine and other antigens uncovered by the aforementioned serologic tests. (51) The fourth requirement that an adjuvant be present could be tested for by serologically determining whether muramyl peptides are present. (52) These peptides are well established adjuvants and are ubiquitous as part of the cell walls of all bacteria.(52)

The above-mentioned studies might well yield information that would not only make all vaccines safer, but could lead to means to prevent postvaccinal autoimmunity by the methods shown to work in animals by Westall and Root-Bernstein and Norga et al.(53,54)

Finally, it should be emphasized that the concerns voiced above in no way denigrate worldwide programs that are attempting to reduce hepatitis B in populations of extremely high risk, both internationally and in the U.S.(55) Certainly, there should be no abrupt stopping of present vaccination programs in the U.S., but it does seem reasonable to develop an informed consent that discloses to parents the potential dangers of the vaccine. Parents then would be able to intelligently decide whether the risk involved justifies their child receiving the vaccination. This might be particularly reasonable in areas of the U.S. in which the incidence of hepatitis B is very low.

ABC News Doc Recommends Homeopathy for Stomach Viruses

ABC News Doc Recommends Homeopathy for Stomach Viruses  January 26, 2012 by Peter Filed under Blog, Flu, Homeopathy In The News, Parents Guide to Children's Health 

ABC News doc - Dr. Albert Levy M.D. just did a story for ABC on stomach viruses.  Eli Manning of the New York Giants recently had a bad stomach virus - so ABC wanted to share treatment options with their viewers.  In the piece, viewable at the link below, Dr. Albert Levy M.D. recommends homeopathic remedies for these viruses.  Good piece.  Check it out! 

And if you want to learn how to treat stomach bugs and other acute conditions like earaches, sore throats, coughs, flu and more - consider becoming a member of the National Center for Homeopathy. 

(http://www.nationalcenterforhomeopathy.org/member-benefits/)

--

Your Wellness Team at

~Access Natural Healing Centre~

604-568-4663

info@accessnaturalhealing.com

www.accessnaturalhealing.com

Facebook:

http://www.facebook.com/homeopath#!/AccessNaturalHealing

Twitter:

http://twitter.com/#!/accesshealing

LinkedIn:

http://www.linkedin.com/profile/edit?trk=hb_tab_pro_top

 

“The information contained in this message is for educational purposes and constitutes a response to a private request for information only and does not constitute a solicitation for services and makes no claim or promise that any product or service that may cure any condition or ailment,”

Homeopathy Halts Cuban Epidemic Better Than Vaccines

Homeopathy Halts Cuban Epidemic Better Than Vaccines  Swamp fever, also known as leptospirosis, is a major problem in Cuba.  Each year, an epidemic of swamp fever plagues the island nation during the flood season when the illness is transferred from rats to people. 

The very serious symptoms of swamp fever include fever, diarrhea, vomiting, jaundice, meningitis, liver failure, renal damage, respiratory illness and in many cases, death. 

Fortunately for Cuba, Big Pharma is not much interested in monopoly control of its healthcare system which leaves the door open for alternative and nontoxic approaches to health to bloom. 

In this environment very open to homeopathy, the Finlay Institute, a Cuban research foundation, worked with Cuban doctors to develop a homeopathic nosode for swamp fever. 

The remedy was based on the homeopathic principle that “like cures like” and was developed and administered on a wide scale as a preventative treatment.  In 2008, 2.5 million people who were most susceptible to the disease were treated with 2 doses of the remedy seven to nine days apart.   The Cuban Ministry of Public Health implemented and managed the operation. 

The results of this effort were nothing short of spectacular. The typical rate of infection when vaccination and antibiotics are used is a few thousand cases per year including some deaths. 

When the homeopathic remedy was used, however, only ten cases of swamp fever were reported among the 2.5 million treated with the homeopathic nosode with no mortality of any hospitalized patients! 

The financial cost to the Cuban government for this astonishingly successful health campaign was only $200,000 compared with the $2,000,000 that would have been incurred for conventional vaccination and antibiotics. 

Not only was homeopathy clearly more effective than vaccines for preventing swamp fever, it was also a much more cost effective solution with no toxic side effects such as is the case with vaccination. 

Homeopathy for epidemics works.  There is no need for toxic and expensive vaccine injections which produce masses of auto-immune compromised children and adults alike in need and dependent upon – more drugs! 

The catalyst for widespread use of homeopathic nosodes as a safe and effective alternative to the ever growing list of toxic vaccines must come from parents, in particular mothers.  Mothers must refuse toxic vaccines for their children and demand this type of safe and effective remedy at a grassroots level as it will never come from the conventional medical establishment which has a strongly invested profit motive for keeping things the way they are. 

Sarah, The Healthy Home Economist 

http://www.thehealthyhomeeconomist.com/homeopathy-halts-cuban-epidemic-better-than-vaccines/

--

Your Wellness Team at

~Access Natural Healing Centre~

604-568-4663

info@accessnaturalhealing.com

www.accessnaturalhealing.com

Facebook:

http://www.facebook.com/homeopath#!/AccessNaturalHealing

Twitter:

http://twitter.com/#!/accesshealing

LinkedIn:

http://www.linkedin.com/profile/edit?trk=hb_tab_pro_top

 

“The information contained in this message is for educational purposes and constitutes a response to a private request for information only and does not constitute a solicitation for services and makes no claim or promise that any product or service that may cure any condition or ailment,”

Effective Cancer Treatment with Popular Cuban Homeopathic Drug Vidatox

Effective Cancer Treatment with Popular Cuban Homeopathic Drug Vidatox

What is Vidatox?

Vidatox is a drug produced from five protein peptides extracted from the venom of the blue scorpion (Rophalorus junceus), which is endemic to Cuba and which has analgesic, anti-inflammatory and anti-carcinogenic effect in more than 15 different cancer cell lines. The result of 15 years of research, by October 2010 Vidatox had been tested on more than 10,000 cancer patients, some 3,500 of them foreigners, with positive results both in improving quality of life and stopping tumour growth.

Labiofam, a Cuban pharmaceutical laboratory, is set to release a new homeopathic cancer drug to the international market. Marketed as Vidatox, it is the result of work by Cuban biologist, Misael Bordier with the venom of the blue scorpion.

The medication was produced from over 5,000 scorpions of the Rhopalurus junceus variety, native to eastern Cuba. According to the company, it has no contraindications and is compatible with any other oncological treatment.

The company presented the results of its Vidatox research in its first international congress in late September in Havana before some 500 delegates from all parts of the world. Vidatox International Congress: Results of Scientific Research

The Company is all set to register its homeopathic version in coming days and go for its commercial production. The medication, and Labiofam says that its homeopathic version should be registered in the coming days and could be commercially produced immediately. González added that the company would continue research to produce synthetic or biotechnological versions of the compound.

Report on the Current Situation Regarding Vidatox 30 CH (Translated from Spanish)

The use of natural products in traditional and alternative medicine is widely practiced today. In particular, the Poison Scorpion have been little studied and a few years ago began their potential pharmacological evidence.

In Cuba there are 32 species and subspecies of scorpions, including 28 endemic among the most common being the scorpion Rhopalurus junceus the which has been used in traditional medicine to apply under the Cuban stomach in case of urinary retention and improvement of some diseases.

The 30 CH VIDATOX ® is the registered trademark for the drug homeopathic and natural (health record: H-11 – 038 – NO2) obtained from junceus Rhopalurus scorpion venom, endemic to Cuba, indicated as adjunctive therapy in the treatment of symptoms caused by effects of cancer and pain relief. The decision to produce is the result over 15 years of a research project aimed at characterization of the poison, and evaluating their potential as antitumor agent, analgesic, antiinflammatory, and toxicological safety.

Based on the evidence of safety and efficacy provided by the preclinical research, VIDATOX 30 CH was applied in a controlled study of 174 cancer patients of both sexes with histopathological diagnosis confirmed, which was administered 5 sublingual drops every 12 hours during the period 3/12/2007 to 2/2/2010.

Samples were grouped by location, neoplastic families, stage evolution of the disease, treatment received and the presence of cancer neoplasia. At the conclusion of the study period (2 years) lung, prostate, colon, breast and uterus were the most sensitive effect of the product. Similarly, it is demonstrated that administration of medication in 96% of patients, led to a life of greater than 12 months regardless of the location and stage of disease, especially in those patients for whom there were no treatment options available in conventional medicine.

As another important clinical outcome may be mentioned that 90% of patients who received VIDATOX ® 30 CH in the dose given, reported improvement of clinical symptoms based on consultation, and in 62% of them initial pain evolved into a mild form that did not require treatment necessarily to their relief, while 27% said absence of pain.

This latter aspect of his enormous influence on the quality of life of patients, is important to detail that 62% of patients with presence of severe pain with continuing need for medication (level 2), after treatment passed to the condition of minimal or moderate pain without medication (level 1).

Generally in patients comprising the sample are referred to herein has been:

  • Improvement in pain
  • Improvement of inflammation
  • Improvement in hematologic parameters
  • Improvement of appetite
  • Improvement of general health
  • Improved function in organs and systems affected
  • Weight gain
  • Reduction of cough
  • Desire to live

We conclude that the use of 30 CH VIDATOX ®, can improve the quality of life, increase survival and slow tumor growth without the appearance of patients today cause undesirable symptoms and cytostatics radiation to which we subject our patients.

In this context, one should not ignore the massive consumption of the product for more of 26,000 people, from October 1 to April 10 of 2010 without reported adverse effects to date of application, confirming the preclinical experimental results.

MSC: Fabio De J. Linares Pazoz Production manager Laboratories Homeopathic Products LABIOFAM-CUBA

Inhibition of basophil activation by histamine: a sensitive and reproducible model for the study of the biological activity of high dilutions

Inhibition of basophil activation by histamine: a sensitive and reproducible model for the study of the biological activity of high dilutions

J. Sainte-Laudy1Corresponding Author Contact InformationE-mail The Corresponding Author, Ph Belon2

 

Received 8 July 2009; revised 21 September 2009; Accepted 23 September 2009. Available online 27 November 2009.

Background

At the beginning of this series of experiments we were looking for a model based on the use of purified commercially available compounds based on a fully described and accepted pharmacological model to study of the biological effect of high dilutions. Negative feedback induced by histamine, a major pro-inflammatory mediator, on basophils and mast cells activation via an H2 receptor me these criteria. The simplest way of measuring basophil activation in the early 1980's was the human basophil activation test (HBDT).

Objectives

Our major goal was first to study the biological effect of centesimal histamine dilutions beyond the Avogadro limit, on the staining properties of human basophils activated by an allergen extract initially house dust mite, then an anti-IgE and N-formyl-Met-Leu-Phe (fMLP). Technical development over the 25 years of our work led us to replace the manual basophil counting by flow cytometry. The main advantages were automation and observer independence. Using this latter protocol our aim was to confirm the existence of this phenomenon and to check its specificity by testing, under the same conditions, inactive analogues of histamine and histamine antagonists. More recently, we developed an animal model (mouse basophils) to study the effect of histamine on histamine release.

Methods and results

For the HBDT model basophils were obtained by sedimentation of human blood taken on EDTA and stained with Alcian blue. Results were expressed in percentage activation. Histamine dilutions tested were freshly prepared in the lab by successive centesimal dilutions and vortexing. Water controls were prepared in the same way. For the flow cytometric protocol basophils were first labeled by an anti-IgE FITC (basophil marker) and an anti-CD63 (basophil activation marker). Results were expressed in percentage of CD63 positive basophils. Another flow cytometric protocol has been developed more recently, based on basophil labeling by anti-IgE FITC (fluorescein isothiocyanate) and anti-CD203 PE (another human basophil activation marker). Results were expressed in mean fluorescence intensity of the CD203c positive population (MFI-CD203c) and an activation index calculated by an algorithm. For the mouse basophil model, histamine was measured spectrofluorimetrically.

The main results obtained over 28 years of work was the demonstration of a reproducible inhibition of human basophil activation by high dilutions of histamine, the effect peaks in the range of 15–17CH. The effect was not significant when histamine was replaced by histidine (a histamine precursor) or cimetidine (histamine H2 receptor antagonist) was added to the incubation medium. These results were confirmed by flow cytometry. Using the latter technique, we also showed that 4-Methyl histamine (H2 agonist) induced a similar effect, in contrast to 1-Methyl histamine, an inactive histamine metabolite.

Using the mouse model, we showed that histamine high dilutions, in the same range of dilutions, inhibited histamine release.

Conclusions

Successively, using different models to study of human and murine basophil activation, we demonstrated that high dilutions of histamine, in the range of 15–17CH induce a reproducible biological effect. This phenomenon has been confirmed by a multi-center study using the HBDT model and by at least three independent laboratories by flow cytometry. The specificity of the observed effect was confirmed, versus the water controls at the same dilution level by the absence of biological activity of inactive compounds such as histidine and 1-Methyl histamine and by the reversibility of this effect in the presence of a histamine receptor H2 antagonist.

Keywords: Human basophil; Mouse basophil; High dilutions; Homoeopathy; Histamine; Flow cytometry; Histamine release; IL4 release

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1475491609000952

Homeopathic Arnica montana for post-tonsillectomy analgesia: a randomised placebo control trial

Homeopathic Arnica montana for post-tonsillectomy analgesia: a randomised placebo control trial A. Robertson1, R. Suryanarayanan2, Corresponding Author Contact Information, E-mail The Corresponding Author, A Banerjee3 Purchase 1 ENT Department, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK 2 ENT Department, Arrowe Park Hospital, Wirral, UK 3 ENT Department, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, UK Received 19 June 2006; revised 3 August 2006; Accepted 30 October 2006. Available online 14 January 2007.

Abstract Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of Homeopathic Arnica in reducing the morbidity following tonsillectomy

Methods: Randomised double blind, placebo controlled trial at a tertiary referral centre. 190 patients over the age of 18 undergoing tonsillectomy were randomised into intervention and control groups receiving either Arnica 30c or identical placebo, 2 tablets 6 times in the first post-operative day and then 2 tablets twice a day for the next 7 days. The primary outcome measure was the change in pain scores (visual analogue scale) recorded by the patient on a questionnaire over 14 days post-operatively; Secondary outcome measures were: analgesia consumption, visits to the GP or hospital, antibiotic usage, the day on which their swallowing returned to normal and the day on which they returned to work. Results: 111 (58.4%) completed questionnaires were available for analysis. The Arnica group had a significantly larger drop in pain score from day 1 to day 14 (28.3) compared to the placebo group (23.8) with p<0.05. The two groups did not differ significantly on analgesic consumption or any of the other secondary outcome measures (number of post-operative visits to GP, use of antibiotics and secondary haemorrhage readmissions).

Conclusion: The results of this trial suggest that Arnica montana given after tonsillectomy provides a small, but statistically significant, decrease in pain scores compared to placebo. Keywords: homeopathy; surgery; pain management; tonsillectomy

Homeopathic and integrative treatment for feline hyperthyroidism – four cases (2006–2010)

Sara Fox Chapman Corresponding Author Contact InformationE-mail The Corresponding Author

Purchase

The Animal Medical Center of Watkins Park, PO Box 426, Cheltenham, MD 20623, USA

Received 7 February 2011; revised 13 May 2011; Accepted 24 May 2011. Available online 28 September 2011.

Hyperthyroidism is a frequent veterinary problem, particularly in elderly cats. Homeopathic treatment and other integrative modalities were provided for four hyperthyroid cats whose owners did not want conventional treatment. Symptomatic homeopathic treatment with Thyroidinum was helpful in one cat. All cats were prescribed an appropriate individualized homeopathic remedy. All four cats showed resolution of clinical signs; three attained normal thyroid hormone levels. Three cats later received acupuncture and/or herbal medicines; two cats later received symptomatic homeopathic remedies. Two cats are thriving after over 3.5 and 4.25 years of treatment; two were euthanized for unrelated problems after 3 and 4 years of treatment. Homeopathic and complementary therapies avoid the potential side effects of methimazole and surgical thyroidectomy, they are less costly than radioactive iodine treatment, and they provide an option for clients who decline conventional therapies.

Keywords: Hyperthyroidism; Feline; Thyroidinum; Constitutional; Individualized; Veterinary; Homeopathy

Influence of Potassium Dichromate on Tracheal Secretions in Critically Ill Patients*

Influence of Potassium Dichromate on Tracheal Secretions in Critically Ill Patients*Michael Frass, MD; Christoph Dielacher, RN; Manfred Linkesch, MD; Christian Endler, PhD; Ilse Muchitsch, PhD; Ernst Schuster, PhD; and Alan Kaye, MD Background: Stringy, tenacious tracheal secretions may prevent extubation in patients weaned from the respirator. This prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with parallel assignment was performed to assess the influence of sublingually administered potassium dichromate C30 on the amount of tenacious, stringy tracheal secretions in critically ill patients with a history of tobacco use and COPD. Methods: In this study, 50 patients breathing spontaneously with continuous positive airway pressure were receiving either potassium dichromate C30 globules (group 1) [Deutsche Ho- mo ̈opathie-Union, Pharmaceutical Company; Karlsruhe, Germany] or placebo (group 2). Five globules were administered twice daily at intervals of 12 h. The amount of tracheal secretions on day 2 after the start of the study as well as the time for successful extubation and length of stay in the ICU were recorded. Results: The amount of tracheal secretions was reduced significantly in group 1 (p < 0.0001). Extubation could be performed significantly earlier in group 1 (p < 0.0001). Similarly, length of stay was significantly shorter in group 1 (4.20 􏰀 1.61 days vs 7.68 􏰀 3.60 days, p < 0.0001 [mean 􏰀 SD]). Conclusion: These data suggest that potentized (diluted and vigorously shaken) potassium dichromate may help to decrease the amount of stringy tracheal secretions in COPD patients. (CHEST 2005; 127:936–941) Key words: COPD; double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study; extubation; homeopathy; tracheal secretions Abbreviations: APACHE 􏰁 acute physiology and chronic health evaluation; BMI 􏰁 body mass index; CPAP 􏰁 con- tinuous positive airway pressure; Fio2 􏰁 fraction of inspired oxygen

Research Study on the remedy "Plumbum metallicum"

Homeopathic pathogenetic trial of Plumbum metallicum: the complete 2000 trial with a synthesis of the original 1828 trial

ABSTRACT Background: in a previous paper we reported the statistical analysis and other distribution data of a homeopathic pathogenetic trial (HPT) of Plumbum metallicum 30cH carried out by our group. However, at that time we did not report the resulting pure materia medica, i.e., the totality of symptoms elicited by the tested medicine on healthy volunteers. Aim: to communicate to the homeopathic community the full record of symptoms collected in our HPT of Plb. Methods: methods to collect and select symptoms have been reported in the previous paper. In synthesis were excluded all previous common symptoms of volunteers, even with slight differences, and selected only those that were really unknown, never seen, unusual or very strange for the prover. In this paper special emphasis was given to new symptoms as well as unusual or repeated dreams, while in the previous paper special emphasis was given to repeated and crossed symptoms. Results: symptoms are reported in their chronological order of appearance in each volunteer. 37 new symptoms were found, useful to update Homeopathic Repertories. It is also included a synthesis of the original HPT of Plb carried out in 1828 in order to make available the full experimental materia medica currently existing. Conclusions: the new HPT, besides widening the pathogenetic picture of Plb (skin and mucosae symptoms), also allowed us to give new and deeper meanings to some of the symptoms reported in the original trial, such as Anxiety, Activity, Depression, Slowness, Gastro-oesophageal problems, Colitis. The dreams complete the remedy image, mainly in work, religion and sexual themes. Up to the present time there is no peer-reviewed publication devoted to HPTs. For this reason, researchers are compelled to publish HPTs as private editions. This results in poor control of the quality of publications and a lack of standards on how to present the results of HPTs. Key words: Homeopathic pathogenetic trials, Plumbum metallicum, retrial, clinical indications.